At the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, live cattle were showing mixed trends, while feeders were on the rise. Feeders received additional support from the lower move in corn and concerns about availability. This indicates the complex interplay of factors influencing these markets. The different closing prices for various months highlight the volatility and the need for careful analysis.
Direct cash cattle trade activity faced an uneventful start to the week. The lack of bidding and asking prices on Monday set the tone for a potentially slow start. However, with the upcoming holiday and the typical post-holiday lull, the focus is now on midweek when the bulk of the business is expected to occur. This shows the importance of timing and market dynamics in the cattle trade.
At the Oklahoma National Stockyards, feeder steers and heifers saw significant price increases. They were $4 to $10 higher, with some instances reaching up to $15 higher. Steer and heifer calves also showed gains of $10 to $15, and in some cases, up to $20 higher. The USDA reported good to very good demand and average quality. Receipts were down on the week but up on the year. The composition of the feeder supply, with 58% steers and 47% over 600 pounds, provides valuable insights into the market.
The price ranges for different weight categories of feeder steers and heifers further illustrate the diversity and complexity of the market. Medium and Large 1 feeder steers weighing 552 to 597 pounds brought $296 to $323, while those weighing 653 to 698 pounds brought $260 to $289. Similarly, Medium and Large 1 feeder heifers in the 564 to 597-pound range brought $264 to $299, and those in the 600 to 648-pound range brought $242 to $269. These details offer a clear picture of the market conditions at the stockyards.
Boxed beef closed higher, with solid demand for solid offerings. Choice beef increased by $2.30 to $309.71, and Select beef rose by $1.67 to $273.74. The Choice/Select spread is $35.97. Estimated cattle slaughter was 120,000 head, up 2,000 on the week but down more than 4,000 on the year.
Lean hog futures also ended the day higher, supported by sharply higher pork values during the session. December lean hogs closed $.30 higher at $81.97, and February lean hogs closed $.25 higher at $85.92. Cash hog prices were not reported on Monday due to confidentiality. Processors were not very aggressive in their procurement efforts at the start of the week. However, with the Thursday holiday, there could be significant movements earlier in the week.
The global market demand for U.S. pork has been strong, providing some price support. But the inconsistency in domestic demand adds pressure to the market. The industry is closely monitoring the availability of market-ready hogs and hog weights. The five-day rolling averages for different regions give an indication of the market trends. For example, the five-day rolling average for barrows and gilts at the National Daily Direct is at $83.31, the average for the Iowa/Minnesota is $84.31, and the five-day rolling average for the Western Corn Belt was $83.71.
Butcher hog prices were lower at midday, down $2 at $53. Pork values closed higher, up $1.56 at $93.33. Various cuts such as ribs, hams, picnics, loins, and butts were all sharply higher, while bellies were sharply lower. Estimated hog slaughter was 489,000 head, even on the week and up about 13,000 on the year. This shows the dynamic nature of the hog market and the various factors at play.
Key OPEC+ members are faced with a crucial decision at this meeting. They need to determine whether to continue with their plans to gradually restore halted oil production. This process has already been delayed twice, and now they must decide if it's time to move forward. The countries are supposed to increase production by 2.2 million barrels a day in monthly installments starting from January. However, with oil prices struggling, this sequence has been postponed from October. The futures market has seen a 15% decline since early July due to faltering Chinese demand and a surge in American supply. At around $75 per barrel, prices are not sufficient for Saudi Arabia and many other OPEC countries to cover their government spending. According to the International Monetary Fund, Riyadh requires prices closer to $100 to fund its ambitious transformation plans.
Traders and analysts surveyed by Bloomberg last week have doubts about OPEC+ proceeding with output increases next year. Citigroup Inc. and JPMorgan Chase & Co. predict that an impending surplus will drive crude prices down towards $60 per barrel. If the group decides to open the taps further, they warn that prices could sink even more. The 23-nation OPEC+ alliance has only convened twice in Vienna since Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. This event has ruptured Moscow's political relations with countries in the European Union and beyond. Most of their sessions since the COVID-19 pandemic have been virtual. At the previous meeting in June, Saudi Arabia extended a last-minute invitation to the other seven members currently involved in supply cutbacks to gather at the Ritz hotel in Riyadh. Nayla Razzouk, Salma El Wardany, and Grant Smith have contributed to this report. For more news, listen to today's daily briefing or go here for more information.
OPEC's Vienna headquarters have played a crucial role in the organization's history. It has been a gathering place for leaders and delegates to discuss and make decisions regarding oil production and policies. The shift to online meetings is a significant development that has implications for the future of OPEC. It reflects the changing dynamics of the global oil market and the need for flexibility in conducting business. In the past, most of OPEC's sessions were held in person, but the recent trend towards virtual meetings has become more prevalent. This change has allowed for greater participation and communication among members, even in times of geopolitical tensions and travel restrictions. The decision to hold this weekend's meeting online is just the latest example of OPEC's adaptability in a rapidly evolving world.
Since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, the OPEC+ alliance has faced numerous challenges. The political relations between Moscow and many European countries have been strained, and this has had an impact on oil markets. The virtual meetings have provided a way for OPEC+ to continue its work and make decisions despite these challenges. It has also allowed for more diverse perspectives and discussions among members. The history of OPEC's Vienna meetings is a testament to the organization's importance in the global oil industry and its ability to adapt to changing circumstances.
The future of OPEC's Vienna meetings remains uncertain. While the shift to online meetings has provided some benefits, there are also challenges that need to be addressed. One of the main concerns is the lack of face-to-face interaction and the potential for miscommunication. In-person meetings allow for more direct communication and the ability to build relationships. However, virtual meetings have their own advantages, such as increased accessibility and the ability to involve a wider range of participants. OPEC will need to find a balance between these two approaches and determine the best way to conduct its meetings in the future.
Looking ahead, OPEC will continue to play a crucial role in the global oil market. The decisions made at its Vienna meetings will have a significant impact on oil prices and supply. As the world recovers from the COVID-19 pandemic and economic conditions continue to evolve, OPEC will need to be agile and responsive. The organization will need to work together with other oil-producing countries and stakeholders to ensure stability and balance in the market. The future of OPEC's Vienna meetings will be closely watched by market participants and analysts around the world.