Laura Glenn, Munson Healthcare's Chief Operating Officer, emphasized the importance of such a facility. "The gap that was identified was not really having a place to go when someone’s in crisis. So, in our community, that has a lot of strain on our emergency departments. What we’re trying to create in the center is really a place to go."
The center is designed to offer a unique environment. As Glenn said, "We designed this to not necessarily feel like a clinical setting. We have living room models and really large open spaces with windows really looking out over wooded areas. It really is intended to be a very soothing calming physical location."
Kelty emphasized the importance of having this service available. "When you have that really great piece of crisis service in your community, you can really help people avoid needing in-patient psychiatric care. You can help them stop maybe a cycle of crisis."
The center is welcoming and free for anyone who needs it. As Kelty said, "If they’re in a crisis and come here, they’re welcomed. Doesn’t matter their age, doesn’t matter their insurance. What matters is that we’re here to help them."
As Davis stated in a statement, "After feedback from the industry, many key changes were made to this version of the Implementation Guide, including added guidance for receiving systems, advanced baseline requirements from USCDI V1, and more." These changes include adding guidance for receiving systems in addition to sending systems, advancing the baseline requirements from USCDI V1 (problem, allergy, medications, immunizations only) to all data classes within USCDI V3, and expanding the guidance to be technology agnostic with added requirements for HL7® FHIR®, HL7 v2.x, and HL7 C-CDA across the topic categories. Additionally, an atopic category for laboratory has been added.
Dr. Adam Davis, the physician informaticist at Sutter Health and DUWG co-chair, highlights the significant amount of hard work and collaboration that went into the revision. The workgroup, which started working on the Implementation Guide Version 2.0 last year and released the draft revision in July, also established a team to collect laboratory guidance from industry subject matter experts and incorporate that feedback into the final version.