OpenAI's "12 days of shipmas" event is yet to commence, but early indications suggest a significant announcement might have already surfaced. A "feature gated" webpage on OpenAI's website refers to a "ChatGPT Pro" plan that packs in all the advantages of ChatGPT Plus along with some new delights.

Uncover OpenAI's Early Event and Subscription Plans

ChatGPT Pro: An Upgraded Subscription

According to the leaked page discovered by software engineer Tibor Blaho on X, ChatGPT Pro offers unrestricted access to all of OpenAI's models. This includes the full version of its o1 "reasoning" model, a condensed release called o1-mini, and GPT-4o. Unlike most AI, o1, o1-mini, and other reasoning models have the ability to self-fact-check, which helps them avoid common pitfalls. However, this also means they often take more time to arrive at solutions. O1 and o1-mini reason through tasks, planning ahead and performing certain actions to tease out answers. OpenAI released a preview of o1 in September and promised to bring o1-mini to all free users of ChatGPT, but this has not yet materialized.In addition to unlimited access to various features, ChatGPT Pro also includes unlimited access to Advanced Voice Mode, ChatGPT's human-like conversational feature, and a new "o1 pro mode" which "uses more compute for the best answers to the hardest questions," as per the page. O1 pro mode may simply increase the "reasoning" time the model takes before responding with an answer. In its o1 preview announcement, OpenAI aimed to experiment with o1 models that reason for hours, days, or even weeks to enhance their reasoning capabilities, and this could be a step in that direction.All these features come at a significant cost. Per the page, ChatGPT Pro starts at $200 per month or £200/€229 depending on the region. Users upgrading from ChatGPT Plus to Pro will receive a prorated credit for the remaining duration of their subscription. This makes ChatGPT Pro easily OpenAI's most expensive subscription plan to date, being 10 times the cost of ChatGPT Plus.There have long been rumors of price hikes for the premium ChatGPT. According to The New York Times, by 2029, OpenAI expects to charge $44 per month for ChatGPT Plus. The company has also considered ultra-costly business subscriptions with additional functionality and access to models under development, as per The Information.

GPT-4.5: The Next Big Model?

A separate leaked webpage discovered by Blaho contains another surprise - mention of what could be OpenAI's next major model. According to the page, subscribers to OpenAI's ChatGPT Team plan will soon get access to a "limited preview" of "GPT-4.5." However, OpenAI later removed the reference to GPT-4.5 from the page. We await further clarity on this matter.

Ladder, a prominent fitness startup based in Austin, Texas, renowned for its popular strength-training app, has launched a scathing accusation against Peloton. The accusation comes in the wake of Peloton's launch of its new Stength+ app, which exited beta on Wednesday. Ladder alleges that Peloton has blatantly ripped off its work.

Ladder Stands Up Against Peloton's App Duplication

Initial Feedback and Investigation

After receiving feedback from Peloton's beta testers indicating that the new app closely resembled Ladder's own in terms of look, feel, and functionality, Ladder conducted a thorough investigation. It was discovered that 15 Peloton product, engineering, and design team members had been using Ladder's app since January 2024. This finding raises serious questions about Peloton's integrity. 1: Such a situation is highly concerning for Ladder. They have put in significant efforts and resources to develop their app, and seeing a rival seemingly copy their work is a blow to their efforts. The fact that Peloton team members were using Ladder's app raises doubts about Peloton's originality and innovation. 2: It's not just about the visual similarities; it's about the overall user experience. Ladder has built a loyal user base with its unique app features and functionality. The fact that Peloton's new app appears to mimic these aspects shows that Peloton may be trying to capitalize on Ladder's success without putting in the same level of innovation.

Employee Use vs. Smoking Gun

While having employees of a rival fitness-focused company use a popular workout app may not be conclusive evidence of copying, it does raise eyebrows. After all, it's common for professionals in the fitness industry to use a variety of competitive products as part of their personal fitness journeys. 1: However, in this case, the frequency with which Peloton staff used Ladder's app and the sharing of session data by Ladder in a blog post add weight to their accusation. It shows a clear pattern of inspiration or perhaps even direct copying. 2: This raises questions about Peloton's research and development processes. Should they have been more vigilant in ensuring that their team members were not exposed to competing apps? Or is this a case of accidental inspiration that has now led to a legal battle?

Financial Situations and Market Dynamics

Peloton was once a pandemic-era success story, but has faced significant challenges in recent years. Supply chain issues and product recalls have plagued the company, and it has had to lay off thousands of workers and replace its CEO multiple times. 1: On the other hand, Ladder is on an upward trajectory. It recently raised $105 million in Series B funding, including a substantial go-to-market investment from General Catalyst. This financial boost has allowed Ladder to expand and grow its user base. 2: The data shows that Ladder's app worldwide downloads for January through November 2024 grew by an impressive 69% year-over-year, while Peloton's installs declined by 33% during the same period. This clearly indicates that Ladder is gaining momentum in the market, while Peloton is struggling to maintain its position.

Marketing and Advertising Opportunity

Ladder is taking full advantage of the news surrounding Peloton's new app launch. By releasing a series of videos on YouTube titled "Ladder Versus Peloton," Ladder is turning the situation into a marketing and advertising opportunity of its own. 1: In these videos, Peloton is represented by a typical "gym bro," while Ladder is portrayed by a cooler and more diverse group of trainers. This contrast helps to highlight the differences between the two apps and positions Ladder as the more innovative and accessible option. 2: Ladder's marketing campaign is a clever way to draw attention to itself and its app while also putting pressure on Peloton. It shows that Ladder is not afraid to stand up for its rights and market its product effectively.

Ladder's Mission and Response

When asked about pursuing legal action against Peloton, a representative for Ladder replied that their mission has always been to make strength training accessible for everyone. While they have had fun with the campaign and appreciate the positive response from their community, they continue to focus on what matters most—their members. 1: This response shows that Ladder is not just interested in a legal battle but in delivering value to its users. They believe that their app provides a superior strength-training experience and are committed to growing their user base. 2: By focusing on their core mission, Ladder is able to maintain a professional and customer-centric approach. They understand that legal battles can be costly and time-consuming, and instead choose to focus on what they do best—creating great fitness apps.