In healthcare, defining vulnerable populations is closely intertwined with risk. Specialized or vulnerable populations encompass individuals facing an elevated risk of experiencing disparities in healthcare access and quality. These qualities increase their vulnerability to health disparities in terms of access, clinical quality, and outcomes. Structural racism and other social inequities inherently disadvantage certain groups. Vulnerable populations can include racial/ethnic minorities, children, the elderly, those with low income, physical or intellectual disabilities, limited insurance coverage, chronic illness, homeless people, veterans, women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and those in rural or healthcare deserts. These characteristics can be innate or acquired. For example, being a racial/ethnic minority is innate, while being socioeconomically disadvantaged is acquired. Risk is often intersectional, meaning an individual can have multiple factors contributing to their vulnerability. Healthcare providers need an intersectional approach to understand these populations and create tailored patient engagement strategies. The National Bioethics Advisory Commission previously proposed six categories of vulnerability for research purposes, which could also be relevant in clinical settings.
There is a distinction between vulnerable and underserved populations. While underserved consumers have limited access to healthcare services, vulnerable consumers face additional barriers. For instance, an individual with Limited English Proficiency (LEP) is considered vulnerable but may have access to high-quality care. Understanding who qualifies as vulnerable helps healthcare providers and organizations detect these populations and implement targeted interventions.
Defining vulnerable populations is closely related to risk stratification. Hospitals and health systems aim to identify members of vulnerable populations to tailor health interventions and promote population health. Addressing the needs of these populations is crucial for achieving healthcare equity. Efforts to understand and eliminate disparities involve targeted interventions, policy changes, and a commitment to inclusivity. Access to patient data is essential for identifying vulnerable populations. Healthcare organizations need to obtain social determinants of health data through patient surveys and third-party sources. They can also capture demographic data during patient intake. Using data standards and a good data governance strategy ensures payers and providers can make sense of the patient information and determine risk effectively.
Strategies for supporting healthcare's underserved vary due to the diverse nature of these populations. Focusing on social determinants of health (SDOH) and care access is key. Strong patient engagement, community-based care, and other SDOH strategies can address health disparities. Offering patient navigation services and improving access to care, including considering appointment hours and physical space, is critical. Community-based care is especially effective for hard-to-reach populations. Technology also plays a significant role in expanding healthcare access, such as telehealth for those in healthcare deserts. However, healthcare providers must be cautious as the digital divide affects vulnerable populations. Overreliance on technology could deepen disparities.
Supporting vulnerable populations requires cultural competence. Some vulnerable populations may avoid healthcare due to low patient trust and previous negative experiences. Improving cultural responsiveness, diversifying the medical workforce, and supporting community-based care and public health messaging can be effective. Enhancing traditional patient engagement strategies, such as shared decision-making and patient education, is also essential, considering the limited health literacy of many vulnerable populations.
Using policy to support interventions is crucial. The most vulnerable populations are expensive to treat due to chronic illness and uncompensated care. Industry-wide policy changes like shifting to a global budgeting system and value-based care models that consider risk and outcomes can help manage this. Value-based reimbursement provides the necessary capital for implementing costly interventions. Funding for community health centers, which serve a large number of vulnerable populations, is also essential and requires continuous reauthorization.
By understanding vulnerable populations and implementing appropriate strategies, industry professionals can achieve better overall population health and health equity. Sara Heath has been covering news related to patient engagement and health equity since 2015.