Portland Public Schools has long been at the center of educational debates. In a recent move, the district is once again engaging in practices that seem to prioritize short-term gains over long-term educational excellence. ("Portland Public Schools floats scaled back costs to build what could have been ‘the most expensive high schools in the United States’" Dec. 4) This raises serious questions about the district's commitment to providing a high-quality education for all students.

Uncovering the Truth Behind Portland Public Schools' Funding Decisions

Shell Games and Educational Priorities

Portland Public Schools finds itself in a predicament where it is playing shell games with its educational resources. The district attempts to spin its move as an act of equity, but in reality, it is taking away funding from desperately needed high school replacements. Ida B. Wells, Cleveland, and Jefferson high schools are being left behind while other schools have already received renovations. This creates an inequity that cannot be ignored.These three schools could have been transformed into modern educational hubs, but instead, they are facing significant cuts. The current designs have been the result of an intensive process involving various stakeholders, including the administration, teachers, support staff, parents, and students. The new facilities are designed to meet the reasonable expectations of providing a high-quality educational experience to all students, without any superfluous extras.

The Need for Holistic Budgeting

There is no denying the need for repairs and remodeling in elementary and middle schools. However, simply sabotaging the funding for high schools is not the answer. Instead, the district should incorporate the costs of these projects into a holistic budgetary approach. This approach would provide a complete response to the future of the district and ensure that all schools receive the attention and resources they deserve.Time and time again, PPS has failed to stand up for a true and complete policy that engages all parties in creating a path to an excellent educational system for future generations. By taking a piecemeal approach to funding, the district is only setting itself up for more problems in the long run.

The Impact on Students

The decisions made by Portland Public Schools have a direct impact on the students. When schools are underfunded and neglected, the educational experience of students suffers. They are left with outdated facilities and limited resources, which can hinder their learning and development.For the students of Ida B. Wells, Cleveland, and Jefferson high schools, the lack of funding means that they are being denied the opportunity to receive a quality education on par with their peers. This is a travesty that cannot be overlooked.In conclusion, Portland Public Schools must rethink its approach to funding and educational priorities. By taking a holistic and comprehensive approach, the district can ensure that all schools receive the resources they need to thrive. Only then can we truly create an excellent educational system for future generations.

CoreLogic, a renowned global provider, plays a crucial role in the property and related industries. With its extensive data and analytics, it offers valuable insights into various aspects of construction and real estate. Let's delve into the details.

Empowering with Accurate CoreLogic Data

CoreLogic's Data Sources and Updating Process

CoreLogic meticulously develops its reports by leveraging up-to-date materials and labor costs. The team of analysts is constantly engaged in researching hard costs such as labor, material, and equipment, including mark-ups. This dedication ensures that the database is updated every month, keeping it in sync with the latest market trends.Moreover, the research extends to soft costs like taxes and fringe benefits, which are essential for reconstruction work in the insurance industry. By monitoring demographics, econometric statistics, government indicators, and localization requirements from thousands of unique economies across the U.S., CoreLogic provides a comprehensive view.

Wage Rates and Construction Data Points

CoreLogic's data encompasses wage rates for more than 85 union and non-union trades. This extensive coverage allows for a detailed analysis of labor costs in different sectors. Alongside, it includes over 100,000 construction data points, providing a rich dataset for in-depth studies. These data points help in understanding productivity rates and crew sizes, which are crucial factors in construction projects.

Building Code Requirements and Localized Costs

Building code requirements and localized cost variables are also integral parts of CoreLogic's research. By considering these factors, the company can provide more accurate estimates of reconstruction costs. It ensures that the data is tailored to specific locations and business conditions, accounting for the unique challenges and opportunities in each area.

Validating Cost Data

To ensure the accuracy of cost data, CoreLogic employs various methods. It analyzes field inspection records, contractor estimates, phone surveys, and both partial and complete loss claim information. This multi-faceted approach helps in validating the data and providing reliable estimates.Please complete the online form to provide feedback or request information on any items in our construction database. For additional explanations or questions, feel free to contact your sales executive or account manager. A more detailed methodology explanation can be found in our Construction Database Pricing Methodology white paper.CoreLogic, headquartered in Irvine, Calif., operates in North America, Western Europe, and Asia Pacific. With over 4.5 billion records spanning more than 50 years, it serves a wide range of markets including real estate and mortgage finance, insurance, capital markets, and the public sector. Clients rely on CoreLogic to identify and manage growth opportunities, improve performance, and mitigate risk.NOTE: The building material, labor, and other cost information in this bulletin is generated using research, sources, and methods current as of the date of this bulletin and is intended only to provide an estimated average of reconstruction cost trends in the specified general geographic regions of the United States. This cost information may vary further when adjusting claim values for specific property locations or specific business conditions.