Recipes
An In-depth Look at Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s Unorthodox Food Views
2024-12-10
Since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. endorsed Donald Trump in the 2024 presidential campaign, his unorthodox views on various public health issues, particularly those related to our food supply, have come to the forefront. If he were to become the next secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), his policy changes could significantly impact the way Americans eat and the regulation of agricultural industries.

Uncovering the Impact of Kennedy's Food Views on Public Health

On Raw Milk

Dairy milk, like many foods, can carry harmful microbes. Before 1938, it was responsible for a quarter of food-based disease outbreaks. But with the widespread adoption of pasteurization, this rate decreased significantly. Raw milk, which has not been pasteurized, is a niche product in many states. While some believe that pasteurization removes beneficial vitamins and bacteria, the amounts of Vitamin C removed are negligible, and the probiotic bacteria in raw milk may not be beneficial in sufficient quantities.

Dairy farming has been consolidated since the New Deal, and pasteurization requirements have favored larger producers. Smaller dairy producers, however, advocate for raw milk. The Delaware Legislature's Consumer Choice Milk Act allows customers to purchase raw milk directly from producers. But when Kennedy claims that raw milk "advances human health" and downplays its risks, he overlooks the potential for severe food-borne illnesses. For example, in November 2024, containers of raw milk sold by Raw Farm in Fresno tested positive for H5N1 bird flu.

On Seed Oils

Kennedy has blamed seed oils for the obesity epidemic and called for animal-based fats in cooking. Seed oils, such as canola, corn, soybean, sunflower, and safflower oils, are common and affordable. While some vegetable-based oils came under fire in the 1990s due to their association with trans fats, most sold in American grocery stores are trans fat-free. Although seed oils contain high levels of omega-6 fatty acids relative to omega-3, the American Heart Association endorses their inclusion in a healthy diet.

Kennedy promotes beef tallow as a healthy alternative to seed oils, but there is minimal evidence that seed oil use causes an increase in obesity while heart disease has decreased. Seed oils are also derived from crops that require pesticides and fertilizers, which are targets of Kennedy's policy agenda. In Sri Lanka, a shift to organic farming led to a drop in rice yields and the need to import crops.

On Food Dyes

Kennedy has attacked cereal companies for using food dyes. There are natural and synthetic food dyes, with the latter regulated by public health authorities. Critics point out that European Union regulations are stricter than in the US. The Feingold Diet blamed certain synthetic food dyes for childhood allergies and hyperactivity, but these claims have been debunked. Studies continue to explore links between childhood behavioral disorders and artificial food dyes, and California recently banned several of them.

Some synthetic dyes can cause cancer in animals and contain carcinogens, and there are no public health benefits to offset the potential downsides. When General Mills attempted to discontinue its "classic" artificially colored Trix cereal in 2015, it faced a consumer revolt and had to reintroduce it. This shows the power of consumer preferences in the food industry.

Social Media's Impact on Kids' Mental Health and Online Time
2024-12-10
Social media has long been recognized as having a significant impact on the mental health of children and teenagers. Recent court battles between school districts and state governments and social media companies highlight the seriousness of this issue. In this article, we will explore the various ways in which social media affects the mental health of young people and discuss potential solutions.

Uncovering the Hidden Dangers of Social Media on Youth

Social Media and Negative Mental Health Effects

Research has clearly shown the negative connection between social media use and mental health issues in kids and adolescents. A 2019 JAMA study found that those using social media for more than three hours a day had a 2.5 times higher risk of anxiety, depression, and loneliness. Even for those already struggling with mental health, spending just over 30 minutes a day on social media led to almost twice the risk of these symptoms. (Riehm 2019)It seems absurd that kids are only supposed to spend 30 minutes online when, on average, teens spend nine hours. With school, homework, and other activities, this leaves them with little time for sleep.For children with ADHD, the negative effects of social media are even more pronounced. Multiple studies have reported that they are more likely to become addicted to platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Moreover, increased social media usage worsens ADHD symptoms such as inattention and increases oppositional behavior, anxiety, and depression. (Dekkers 2022)

Surgeon General's Social Media Advisory

The overuse of social media is so harmful to teens' mental health that the Surgeon General of the United States issued a social media advisory in 2023. With almost 95% of youth ages 13-17 using social media and more than one in three using it "almost constantly," the issue is widespread. The advisory reports that frequent social media use can harm children and adolescents in multiple ways. It can increase impulsive behavior, worsen emotional regulation and social behavior. Research also shows that social media may change parts of the brain responsible for emotions and learning.

TikTok and Mental Health Effects on Kids and Teens

Internal TikTok documents reported by NPR state that when kids watch TikTok, they miss out on important activities like sleep, eating, moving around, and looking at others in the eyes. TikTok's own research quoted in a lawsuit by Kentucky authorities states that "compulsive usage correlates with a slew of negative mental health effects like loss of analytical skills, memory formation, contextual thinking, conversational depth, empathy, and increased anxiety."Parents should be aware that TikTok can quickly pull kids into "filter bubbles" that promote disordered eating, self-harm, or suicide. One of TikTok's internal documents states that users are "placed into 'filter bubbles' after 30 minutes of use in one sitting." These filter bubbles or "echo chambers" are also encouraged by the algorithms on all social media platforms to keep users engaged.

TikTok and Meta: Awareness of Platform Harm

In another set of documents, NPR reports that TikTok knew its features could lead kids and teens to develop a "constant and irresistible urge" to keep using the app. It takes just 260 videos or as little as 35 minutes to form such an addictive habit, according to the NPR report.Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, has also had its documents leaked. In 2021, former Facebook product manager Frances Haugen testified to Congress that Meta put profits before people by downplaying the harms of its platforms. NPR reported that Haugen leaked internal Meta research showing that 13.5% of teen girls said Instagram worsens suicidal thoughts and 17% said it contributes to their eating disorders.

Social Media Protection Features: Ineffectiveness

Unfortunately, the protection features put in place by social media platforms themselves have been largely ineffective. Parents should not rely on them alone.Age restrictions are not enforced. Despite the required minimum age of 13 in the US, nearly 40% of children ages 8-12 are using social media. Most platforms rely on users simply stating their age, and verification beyond this is limited and inconsistently enforced.Meta, which is being sued by 40 states and the District of Columbia for allegedly using addictive features that harm children's mental health, has launched a new tool. A Meta spokesperson shared that they "developed numerous tools to support parents and teens," including new "Teen Accounts" on Instagram with added protections, according to Reuters.Publicly, TikTok promotes its tools. One gives users a time prompt at 60 minutes a day, and another allows parents to limit usage to 40 minutes to two hours. TikTok also promotes "break" videos to encourage users to take a break. However, internal documents show that executives view these break videos as a "good talking point" and that the time tools only improve "public trust in the TikTok platform via media coverage." In internal tests, TikTok found that their tools led to virtually no change in usage. Before the tool, teens were spending about 108.5 minutes a day, and after, they spent approximately 107 minutes. One document revealed by NPR quotes a TikTok project manager saying, "Our goal is not to reduce the time spent." Another employee's chat message stated that the goal is to "contribute to DAU [daily active users] and retention" of users.

Parents' Role in Protecting Kids

The most powerful tool parents have to protect their kids' mental health from the negative effects of too much time on social media is to engage with them. By combining parental controls, time limits, and ongoing conversations about social media, parents can make a difference.
See More
Top Dem Calls for Abandoning $895B Defense Bill Due to Transgender Treatment Ban
2024-12-09
Rep. Adam Smith, the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, has sparked a significant debate with his stance on the latest version of the annual defense policy bill. The 1,800-page, $895.2 billion NDAA, which outlines U.S. national security and defense priorities for the fiscal year, includes a provision that prohibits most transgender medical care for minors. This has drawn sharp criticism from Smith and others.

Smith's Disapproval and Johnson's Response

Smith, a Democrat from Washington, leads the committee involved in crafting the NDAA each year. In a Sunday night statement, he emphasized the bipartisan efforts that typically go into the bill but criticized the final text for including the controversial transgender provision. He argued that denying health care to those in need based on biased notions is wrong.On the other hand, Speaker Mike Johnson praised the NDAA for the same measures that Smith is critiquing. Johnson's office pointed to his initial statement lauding the compromise NDAA, stating that it includes provisions to restore military focus and end radical ideology.The hesitation from defense hawks like Smith could pose a challenge to the passage of the entire NDAA. The legislation usually passes with wide bipartisan approval, but expected opposition from progressives and conservatives on various issues may complicate matters.Its first test will occur late on Monday afternoon when the NDAA is debated before the House Rules Committee. If it fails to pass in committee, House leaders may be forced to send it to the House floor under suspension of the rules, raising the threshold for passage.

Details of the Transgender Provision

The provision in question specifically states that "medical interventions for the treatment of gender dysphoria that could result in sterilization may not be provided to a child under the age of 18," referring to the transgender children of U.S. service members. This has sparked intense discussions about the balance between medical care and ideological stances within the defense policy bill.Smith believes that this provision injects a level of partisanship not traditionally seen in defense bills and that Speaker Johnson is pandering to extreme elements of his party. He urges Johnson to abandon this effort and return to a more traditional bipartisan process that supports troops and their families.

Impact on the Bipartisan Process

The NDAA is typically a product of bipartisan House and Senate negotiations. However, the inclusion of this controversial provision has disrupted the usual process and raised questions about the future of such legislation. Defense hawks like Smith's concerns highlight the potential for ideological differences to undermine the consensus-building that is essential for the passage of important defense policies.If the NDAA fails to pass, it could have significant implications for U.S. national security and defense priorities. It remains to be seen how the House Rules Committee will handle the debate and what the ultimate outcome will be.

Looking Ahead

As the NDAA faces its first test, the outcome remains uncertain. The defense policy bill is a crucial piece of legislation that shapes the future of the U.S. military and its role in the world. The controversy surrounding the transgender provision has added an additional layer of complexity to an already important and politically charged process.Whether the bill can overcome these challenges and secure passage remains to be seen. The decisions made in the coming days will have a significant impact on U.S. defense policy and the political landscape.
See More