En Córdoba, una mujer presentó un caso ante el Juzgado de Familia Número 2. Su ex marido, padre de sus dos hijos, vive con otro hombre. Esto desató una discusión sobre cómo establecer el régimen de comunicación paterno-filial.

Descubre cómo el Juzgado de Córdoba maneja la diversidad en las familias

La Situación Presentada

Una mujer, preocupada por la forma en que se establecería el régimen de comunicación entre ella y sus hijos y su ex marido, pidió al juez que tomara en cuenta su situación. Su ex marido, padre de los hijos, vive en un entorno diferente a lo que era tradicional.Esto llevó a un debate sobre la importancia de respetar la diversidad y la privacidad de las familias. El juez Gabriel Tavip tuvo que enfrentarse a esta situación y encontrar una solución equitativa.

La Decisión del Juez

El juez estableció que el planteo de la madre era improcedente. Sin embargo, instó a la madre a respetar la diversidad y a ayudar a los niños a crecer en un ambiente de aceptación y comprensión.El juez recordó que la vida privada y las decisiones personales de los progenitores son parte de su esfera de intimidad. La orientación sexual o género de los progenitores no debe impactar en una resolución judicial relativa a los cuidados de los hijos o en la determinación del régimen de contacto.Lo importante, según el juez, es verificar el cumplimiento de los deberes de protección, cuidado, respeto y acompañamiento, así como el afianzamiento del derecho a la coparentalidad de hijas e hijos.

El Rol de la Madre

Además, el juez instó a la madre a que, en el marco de su papel maternal, respetara el derecho a la diversidad. Debería conformarse a los valores de inclusión y respeto consagrados por los Tratados de Derechos Humanos ratificados por Argentina.Recordó que el mandato de no discriminación aparece también de manera explícita en diversas normas del Código Civil. La madre debe abstenerse de exponer en la causa cuestiones que conciernen exclusivamente a la intimidad del progenitor.

Capacitaciones para la Abogada

Finalmente, el juez recomendó a la abogada de la mujer que profundizase las capacitaciones en materia de género. Quienes ejercen la labor profesional en materia de las familias deben tener una mirada que permita respetar los derechos humanos fundamentales de todas las personas, incluyendo las diversidades sexuales.En resumen, este caso en el Juzgado de Córdoba muestra la importancia de respetar la diversidad en las familias y de garantizar los derechos de todos. La resolución del juez busca encontrar un equilibrio entre la privacidad de los progenitores y el bienestar de los hijos.

In a significant development for the American food industry, a red food dye commonly found in snacks, beverages, and candies may soon face a ban by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This additive, known as red 3 and derived from petroleum, has been a staple in many food products for years. But growing health concerns have now put it under intense scrutiny.

Why Red 3 Is Under the Spotlight

Red 3 has long been flagged for potential health risks. Despite the FDA's assertion that approved additives are safe when consumed correctly, numerous studies have shown it to be carcinogenic in animal testing. Since 1990, it has been banned from cosmetics but remains widely used in nearly 3,000 food products, including beloved brands like Peeps, Pez, and Betty Crocker. 1: The presence of red 3 in such a large number of food products raises serious questions about its safety. Consumers often consume these products without realizing the potential risks associated with this dye. It's crucial that the FDA takes a closer look at the cumulative effect of these exposures on public health. 2: The fact that red 3 is still in use despite the evidence of its carcinogenicity shows the need for a more rigorous regulatory process. The FDA must act swiftly to address this issue and protect the health of the American population.

FDA's Planned Move

Jim Jones, the FDA's deputy commissioner for human foods, has informed a Senate health committee that the agency is actively reviewing a petition to revoke red 3's authorization. This indicates that regulatory changes could be on the horizon. 1: The agency's review process is a crucial step in determining the future of red 3. It shows that the FDA is listening to the concerns of the public and health groups and is taking action to address them. 2: However, the timing of these regulatory changes remains uncertain. Consumers and industry stakeholders are waiting with bated breath to see what the FDA will decide.

Public and Legislative Reactions

The push to ban red 3 has gained significant momentum from public health groups and lawmakers. Many argue that the dye serves no nutritional purpose and is used only for aesthetic reasons to make products more marketable. 1: Critics like Democratic congressman Frank Pallone have been vocal in their opposition to the continued use of red 3. They believe that there is no valid reason for this chemical to be in our food other than to deceive and mislead consumers. 2: California's decision to ban red 3 in 2023 has set an important precedent. It shows that other states and the federal government may follow suit in their efforts to protect public health.

Health Risks and Concerns

Red 3 has been linked to several health issues, particularly behavioral problems in children. Environmental and health advocacy groups are also concerned about its potential long-term impact on public health. 1: The Center for Science in the Public Interest (CSPI) has been at the forefront of advocating for stricter food safety standards. They argue that the FDA should align its policies with scientific evidence and international standards to ensure the safety of our food supply. 2: The potential health risks associated with red 3 highlight the need for greater transparency in the food industry. Consumers have a right to know what ingredients are in the products they consume and should be able to make informed choices.As the FDA reviews the petition to ban red 3, the pressure to reevaluate other controversial food dyes is mounting. Public awareness campaigns and legislative efforts are driving the conversation about the need for stricter food safety standards in the US. In the meantime, consumers are encouraged to be vigilant and read product labels carefully to avoid foods with synthetic dyes. Stay informed about updates from the FDA and make healthier choices for yourself and your family.