La perseverancia y el amor por el fútbol llevaron a un joven guineano a superar obstáculos insospechados. Durante meses, este talentoso jugador no dejaba de soñar con regresar a España, donde había dejado una huella imborrable en un torneo juvenil. En Guinea Conakry, los desafíos parecían inabordables tras un golpe de Estado que paralizó el país y sus sueños. Sin embargo, la determinación de Seydouba Cissé no conocía límites. Diariamente, pese al caos político y militar, acudía a las puertas de la embajada española en busca de su visado. Finalmente, gracias a la intervención del padre de Ilaix Moriba, quien actuó como su representante, logró que su solicitud fuera atendida y continuara su camino hacia el Leganés CF.
Una vez en España, Cissé encontró en el club un refugio y una familia. Su sonrisa permanente es testimonio de la realización de un anhelo que parecía lejano. Al firmar su primer contrato profesional, sintió que todo su esfuerzo había valido la pena. El ascenso del equipo a la Primera División fue el colofón perfecto para esta historia de superación. Para Cissé, cada partido es una oportunidad única, jugando siempre con la intensidad de una final. Su gratitud hacia el Leganés es profunda, reconociendo que este club ha sido fundamental en su desarrollo tanto personal como profesional. “Dios me da paz, confianza y pensamiento positivo”, afirma, demostrando que la fe y la actitud positiva pueden transformar vidas.
La historia de Seydouba Cissé es un ejemplo viviente de que con determinación y resiliencia se pueden superar los mayores desafíos. Su viaje desde un pequeño pueblo en Guinea hasta los campos de fútbol más prestigiosos de Europa es un recordatorio de que los sueños, por muy distantes que parezcan, pueden hacerse realidad. Este jugador no solo ha conquistado su propio destino, sino que también inspira a todos aquellos que enfrentan adversidades. En su vida, Cissé ya ganó su propia Champions League, y sigue adelante con una sonrisa inquebrantable.
In a significant development, the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has imposed restrictions on General Motors (GM), prohibiting the sale of sensitive driver data. The regulatory body claims that GM and its OnStar service were collecting and selling detailed geolocation and driving behavior information without proper authorization. This ban will remain in effect for five years. The FTC's action aims to protect consumer privacy and curb unauthorized surveillance practices. GM has already made adjustments to its data policies, including discontinuing certain programs and simplifying its privacy guidelines.
In a landmark decision, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has taken decisive action against General Motors, headquartered in Detroit, by banning the automaker from selling sensitive driver data for the next five years. According to FTC Chair Lina M. Khan, GM was collecting and selling precise geolocation data and driving behavior information at frequent intervals, sometimes as often as every three seconds. This practice occurred without obtaining explicit consent from consumers, raising serious privacy concerns.
The automaker has responded to these allegations by making several policy changes. In April 2024, GM discontinued its Smart Driver program and unenrolled all customers following a report by The New York Times that revealed GM was sharing personal driving information with insurance companies. Additionally, GM severed ties with LexisNexis and Verisk last year and consolidated its privacy policies into a single, more transparent document in September.
The FTC's order mandates that GM must now obtain clear customer consent before collecting, using, or disclosing specific types of connected vehicle data. Consumers will also have the option to disable the collection of their vehicle's precise location and access tools to manage and delete their data. These measures align with GM's ongoing efforts to enhance privacy protections across all 50 states.
This case reflects growing scrutiny from both state and federal regulators over automakers' data collection practices. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has also sued GM, accusing the company of misleading consumers into sharing their data. Similar legal actions have been taken against other entities like Allstate Insurance for comparable conduct.
From a journalist's perspective, this ruling underscores the importance of safeguarding consumer privacy in an era where technology and data collection are increasingly intertwined. It highlights the need for transparency and accountability in how companies handle personal information. For readers, it serves as a reminder to be vigilant about the data they share and to understand the policies governing its use.