Software
Bluesky's Verification vs. X's Blue Checks: A Different Approach
2024-11-26
Bluesky, the rapidly emerging social networking startup, is set to revolutionize user account verification. Built on open web principles as an alternative to Twitter/X, Bluesky is taking a unique approach that differs from existing services like Meta and X. In a recent livestream, the company revealed its plans and strategies for verification, sparking significant interest in the digital space.

Unlock a New Era of Account Verification with Bluesky

Bluesky's Custom Domain Verification

Currently, the only way to verify an account on Bluesky is by adopting a custom domain name. This option was introduced by the company last year, allowing users to establish a clear identity. For instance, the account @nytimes.com on Bluesky belongs to the real The New York Times publication. By using custom domains, Bluesky ensures that users can be easily identified and trusted.Moreover, Bluesky directly addresses impersonation issues as they arise. This proactive approach helps maintain the integrity of the platform and protects users from false identities.

Beyond Custom Domains: Multiple Verification Providers

Bluesky believes that custom domains may only be part of the solution for verification in the future. The company is considering a model where multiple verification providers coexist. As explained by CEO Jay Graber, "We could be a verification provider — and we might at some point (and also, no, I’m not sure when). But it would be something where you’re accessing through one app, and then there might be another app and there might be other services. And they can choose to trust us — the Bluesky team’s verification — or they could do their own. Or other people could do their own."This proposed system allows for greater diversity and flexibility in verification. Different entities can choose to verify users based on their own rules and policies. For example, a university could verify users as alumni, or a fan group like the Swifties could verify people as community members. These verification providers can be selective in who gets verified or offer more comprehensive services.

Challenges in Presenting Multiple Verifications

The CEO acknowledged that one of the challenges is how to present multiple verifications to the end user without causing confusion. The company needs to figure out how these verifications would appear, perhaps as badges. It also needs to ensure that other third-party Bluesky apps display them in the same way as the company's official client."We’re trying to design long-term for more applications [and] more services, beyond our own, to operate," noted Graber. This shows Bluesky's commitment to creating a comprehensive verification system that can adapt to various needs.

Growth and Future Plans

Bluesky's 20-person team has been working hard to keep up with the platform's growth spike. Since the U.S. presidential elections and other policy changes, users have been leaving Musk's X and joining Bluesky. In just a short period, Bluesky has added 8.7 million new users and now has over 22.7 million total users. This rapid growth has forced the company to focus on long-term plans.On the livestream, the team also discussed other long-term plans, such as designing Bluesky profiles to connect users to their broader web presence, similar to Linktree. However, due to the rapid growth, the company couldn't commit to a specific timeline for rolling out these features.In conclusion, Bluesky is poised to transform the way user account verification works. With its innovative approach and commitment to flexibility, it is likely to set a new standard in the digital world.
Spotify Limits Third-Party Devs' Access to Recommendation Features
2024-11-27
Spotify's recent announcement in a developer blog post has sent shockwaves through the developer community. The music streaming giant will no longer permit developers building third-party apps with its Web API to access several crucial features. This move comes as part of their ongoing efforts to address security challenges faced by many companies today.

Unraveling Spotify's API Access Limitations

Security and API Misuse

According to a Spotify spokesperson in an email to TechCrunch, these changes are aimed at curbing certain developers who have been misusing the API. By scraping data from the platform, some developers have been engaging in activities that potentially violate security protocols. The features being revoked access to, such as song and artist recommendations, provide valuable insights into the Spotify userbase's listening habits. This data, if misused, could lead to the creation of competitive AI music recommendation models, which Spotify has been developing itself in recent years.

For instance, the Audio Analysis feature that describes a track's structure and rhythm, as well as the Audio Features that reference different song characteristics like "danceability" and energy, are now off-limits to developers. This not only affects those building AI apps but also those with completely unrelated app ideas. One developer in the Spotify community forum expressed concern, stating, "With the advent of transformer models, there's probably a risk of people training new models to emulate Spotify's model(s). I really hope that's not the reason they're taking it down, but if it is, I'm just disappointed."

Impact on Developers

Beyond the obvious loss of access to specific features, developers who have more limited API access than official Spotify partners will be particularly affected. Those who have previously applied for an extension will still be able to use these API endpoints for now. However, it seems that Spotify did not provide prior warning about these changes, leaving many developers in the dark.

For example, some developers were using these features to create AI music recommendation services, which were providing unique value to users. Now, with the access cut off, their apps will lose a significant part of their functionality. Another developer pointed out, "Let's be real here, this isn't about security or user privacy. This is clearly about data being used for training AI models."

Spotify's AI Initiatives

In recent years, Spotify has been actively building AI music models. Its CEO, Daniel Ek, has emphasized the potential of AI for creativity in music. The company has released a few AI products based on these models, such as the AI DJ last year. Additionally, it has rolled out AI playlists to more users in countries like the United States, Canada, Ireland, and New Zealand.

Despite these efforts, the decision to restrict API access has raised questions about the company's approach. Will these restrictions hinder the growth of the developer ecosystem and the innovation it brings? Or will they ultimately lead to a more secure and sustainable platform?

See More
Italian Food Delivery App Foodinho Fined for Privacy Issues Again
2024-11-22
Food delivery firm Foodinho has once again found itself in the crosshairs of Italy's privacy watchdog. This isn't an isolated incident but rather a recurring pattern that raises serious concerns about the company's data handling practices. Reuters reports that the Glovo-owned on-demand delivery app has been slapped with a hefty €5 million ($5.20 million) fine due to its unlawful processing of data belonging to over 35,000 riders registered on the platform.

Key Issues Unveiled

One of the major issues identified is the transfer of riders' geolocation data to third parties without their explicit consent. This includes even when the riders were not actively working, up until August 2023. The privacy watchdog has demanded immediate changes in the app's messaging to riders and its GPS feature to ensure that tracking can be easily turned off when riders are not on duty.Moreover, Foodinho has been prohibited from using riders' biometric data, such as facial recognition, for identity verification purposes. This move is a significant step towards safeguarding riders' privacy.Back in 2021, when Foodinho had approximately 19,000 registered riders, Italy's watchdog had already fined the company around $3 million for a long list of data protection and algorithmic management issues. It seems that the app has not learned its lesson and remains complacent when it comes to privacy compliance.The implications of these fines and restrictions are far-reaching. For one, it damages the trust that riders have in the app and the company. It also raises questions about the company's overall data management strategies and its commitment to protecting user privacy.In today's digital age, where data is king, companies like Foodinho have a responsibility to handle user data with the utmost care and compliance. The repeated fines and penalties serve as a stark reminder that privacy is not something to be taken lightly.Foodinho needs to take these issues seriously and implement comprehensive measures to ensure that such violations do not occur in the future. Only by doing so can the company regain the trust of its riders and avoid further legal troubles.The privacy of riders should be at the forefront of Foodinho's operations. It is essential that the company learns from its past mistakes and takes proactive steps to protect the data of its users.
See More